Importance Of Nature Based Attraction

richness Of Nature Based AttractionLang OLeary (1997) utter that disposition-based tourists are more(prenominal) interested in nature, travel more often at chronic distances and stick longer at a end point. Moreover, they are well educated, with lofty levels of both individual and household income and are willing to spend more. Silverberg et al., (1996) stated that nature based tearion is a phenomenon which represents a new mart in the touristry industry and has captured the mind of planners and marketers. Nyaupane et al., (2004), suggested that nature based touristry has been growing rapidly than tourism in general. When the finale managers attempt to attract the growing market, they are faced with a double paradoxical undertaking in the beginning, there is the need to preserve the resources that attract the tourist and provides a quality travel experience Backman et al., (1999). It is a challenge which requires a ratio between the individuals expectations, preferen ces and attitudes towards the environment for a successful nature-based experience Uysal et al., (1992) cited in Silverberg et al., (1996).2.2.2.2 Importance of nature-based love2.2 Tourism attractionsAccording to Mill and Morrisson (1985), the tourism system is make of four key segments the market, travel, tourist coatings and marketing. Moreover, Gunn (1988) stated that tourism attractions deal with tourism destinations highlights the role of tourism attractions (tourist, traffic, attraction, nurture and signposting). Therefore, tourism attractions forms an essential take apart of the tourism destinations and they are one of four key segments of the tourism system.Tourism attraction is the major reason why tourist visits a destination. The tourist harvest-tide includes attractions, services and infrastructures. Gunn (1988) said that tourism attractions are composed of the several components including tourists activities, local scenery, service and entertainment. Together, th ese features represent the total conjure up of inseparable and man-made characteristics. For example, separately historical site or lake has its own uniqueness in its features and appeal and can non be judged as identical to other tourism resources. All tourism attractions are tourism resources, but all tourism resources are not tourism attractions. It may be impossible to evaluate the attraction of the various tourism destinations.Also, Laarman and Durst (1987) use level of interest and degree of physical thoroughness to signalise between soft and hard nature tourists. Lindberg (1991, cited in Meric Hunt, 1998), moves from twofold typologies to a fourfold categories.He suggests that there are1. hard core nature tourists who has high levels of environmental commitment and support for enhance sustainability, want physically and challenging experiences, travel in small groups, take longer trips, subscribe to for fewer services and make their own travel arrangements2. dedicated nature tourists who take trips precisely to protected areas in order to appreciate local, natural and cultural history3. mainstream nature tourists who visit destinations primarily to take an foreign trip and finally,4. casual nature tourists who enjoy nature as part of a wider trip.However, Eduard kuen (2010) argued that a destination without potential or truly tourism attractions cannot be developed into a tourism destination. Potential tourism becomes real only when it provides visitor accessibility like physical access, universe access, sightseeing. Only the real tourism attraction can be pursue on the tourism market and be promoted. Also, Hu and Richie (1993), Muller (1994) stated that the sorting of tourism attractions into natural and artificial in the main obstacle to an cost-effective approach to tourism attractions.2.5 Destination piquantnessPearce (1979) defined destination attractiveness as the responsiveness to which the destination meet expectations of its visi tors in terms of provender and accommodation, natural beauty, cultural richness, recreational opportunities and other amenities. The more a destination is able to meet the needs of the tourists, the more it is perceived to be attractive and the more the destination is likely to be chosen.Without tourism there would be no tourist attractions. Attraction is the ability of a destination to digest individual benefits. Ferrario (1979) stated that it only happened when people are attracted towards a destination whereby the facilities and services follow. Attractiveness is the outline of impressions, ideas and beliefs about destinations based on information from various sources (MacKay and Fesenmaier 1997). In short, the greater the attraction power of a finical destination, the higher will be the number of tourists in terms of their stay and tourist receipts. There are some factors which cannot be categorized as attractions but which plays an important role in the attractiveness of a destination such as infrastructure, exchange rate and political stability (Ferrario 1979).A tourist preference appears to be more precise and is the ultimate conclusion in defining the level of attractiveness of a destination. Their perceptions about a given area control its success or failure as a tourist destination. Since perceptions are certainty in the travelers mind, it does not involvement how many tourism resources are accessible in a specialised area when all its attractiveness has already been well-defined (Echtner and Ritchie, 1993 Leyele, 1996). However, the limitation of tourist preferences as attraction measures is that human observations are based on personal and cultural beliefs and are influenced by promotional actions and previous experiences (Milman and Pizam, 1995). In addition, factor like bad weather may create a colorful perception of a tourist destination.